An article in The
Times on Monday 29 January 2018 gave details of a medieval scroll known as
the Canterbury Roll. While this is not a new discovery, what is new is that it
has been digitised and is available for everyone to see at the Canterbury University, NZ website. Originally called ‘The Maude Roll’ after its nineteenth
century owners, it was purchased by Canterbury College - now Canterbury
University - Christchurch, New Zealand early in 1918. Arnold Wall, a professor
at the college published a transcription of the roll in 1919 and this too has
been made available on the website and can be downloaded as a pdf.
When the Maude family moved to New Zealand in the nineteenth
century they took the roll with them, the story was that it had always been in
the family, and Wall attempted to trace the family back to the fifteenth
century, when the roll was first written. Subsequent research suggests that
ownership by the Maude family may not go back any further than the nineteenth
century. Who commissioned the roll in the fifteenth century therefore remains
something of a mystery.
With its digitisation it is possible to explore the roll in
detail. It is a genealogy of the kings of England, created early in the
fifteenth century. Beginning with the founding myth of English kings, from the
Trojan refugee Brutus travelling to Albion and renaming the island Britannia,
through the mythical kings of Britain including Arthur, to the Saxon kings, in
continuous succession to Henry VI when the roll was created. Since 1429-33,
when it was first written, the roll has undergone a number of amendments.
It is thought that it was originally drawn up to demonstrate
the Lancastrians’ legitimate claim to the throne. Richard II’s deposition is
passed over, as is the claim of the Mortimers. Legitimate descent is shown in a
straight line from Edward III. It does not reflect Henry IV’s early dalliance
with the idea that Edmund Crouchback was the eldest son of Henry III; that was
a notion too far, it was much easier to simply overlook a claim through a
woman.
With the accession of Edward IV the roll then undergoes an
amendment. The new scribe has made notes to ensure there is no mistake
about who is the true king. He adds a note to show that Richard II was deposed
and Henry IV usurped the throne. Red lines are then added to show the
true line of descent from Edward III that is, via Lionel of Clarence and his
daughter Philippa. Added to the descent through Edmund Duke of York, the
legitimacy of the house of York is undisputed. ‘Edward, son and heir of the above
named Richard, recently duke of York, true heir of the kingdoms of England and
France, ... on the fourth day of March, through the greater and more sensible
[part] of the people, was elected as king of England by the grace of God and
the voice of those [people], rising and receiving the kingdom of England in
London for himself, by law so much as by inheritance, in the year of the Lord
1460.’
As well as Edward IV, the new scribe includes his brothers, Edmund,
George and Richard and his sisters Anne, Elizabeth and Margaret. Margaret is
named as duchess of Burgundy so this amendment must have been made after her
marriage in 1468. Sadly no further amendments were made to the roll.
The roll is seen as a piece of propaganda, originally for
Henry VI and then Edward IV. Who commissioned the roll is a mystery. Did it
remain in the same hands throughout the fifteenth century? Was the owner someone who changed sides and
wished to demonstrate his new allegiance to the house York, or was it someone
who was simply reflecting the ‘reality’ of the day.
It is a pity that it ends with Edward IV, it would have been
interesting to see how the owner reflected the changes of 1483 and 1485. Was it
too dangerous or too uncertain? Or had the owner died or lost interest?
What the role does show is that genealogy was important, and
that something seemingly so straight forward could be disputed. Genealogy as
propaganda was not limited to this roll, a number exist. A splendid example
should already be known to members, it can be partially viewed here (a digital copy is available on CDRom, entitled Leaves of Gold, through the
society shop). Held by the Free Library of Philadelphia, this is a beautifully
illustrated roll. Edward IV appears at the top in full military glory, there is
no mistaking that ‘this sun of York’ was responsible for its production. The
Canterbury Roll looks more like a working copy beside it, having little in the
way of illustration. It is easy to imagine Edward’s roll on display, but it is
hard to imagine that many people actually saw the Canterbury Roll. The value of
either as propaganda is therefore hard to see. Those seeing Edward’s roll may
have been visitors to his court, in many ways it was therefore preaching to the
converted or the already loyal.
The Canterbury Roll perhaps lay amongst other records and
chronicles, but someone thought it worth updating, just as Chronicles were
continually added to and updated. For the modern reader it adds another mystery
to the fifteenth century; who owned the roll and what was it they did or did
not want to say about the occupier of the throne and any potential claimants?
Lynda Pidgeon
Medieval genealogies could take many forms - this tree from British Library MS Harley 7353 takes a much more image-based approach than the Canterbury Roll. It shows Henry IV literally cutting through the branch on which Richard II sat and has Henry VI and Edward IV facing each other at the top, swords at the ready.
Lynda Pidgeon
Medieval genealogies could take many forms - this tree from British Library MS Harley 7353 takes a much more image-based approach than the Canterbury Roll. It shows Henry IV literally cutting through the branch on which Richard II sat and has Henry VI and Edward IV facing each other at the top, swords at the ready.
